<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opinionated Wine Guide.com &#187; Wine Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opinionatedwineguide.com/category/wine-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opinionatedwineguide.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of California wine, one region at a time with David Locicero, author of Pour Me Another: An Opinionated Guide to Gold Country Wines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Snob or Geek?</title>
		<link>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2013/04/27/snob-or-geek/</link>
		<comments>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2013/04/27/snob-or-geek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dslocicero]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Snob]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opinionatedwineguide.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forbes online edition recently published this article, Wine Snob or Wine Geek? In it they list the typical characteristics of each &#8220;type&#8221;. It is a brief humorous piece. But are those the only two options for people who like wine? Snob or Geek? Really? And it seems to me that the distinction between Snob or [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2013/04/27/snob-or-geek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some People!</title>
		<link>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2012/12/19/some-people/</link>
		<comments>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2012/12/19/some-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dslocicero]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Maclean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opinionatedwineguide.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I generally try to stay out of the politics and scandals of wine writing. In most cases the kerfuffles are more about personality than substance and really don&#8217;t affect me or my readers very much, if at all. However, recently noted Canadian wine writer, Natalie MacLean, whose last book I reviewed at her request, has been accused [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2012/12/19/some-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sweet Wines Not Just For Dessert</title>
		<link>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/12/21/sweet-wines-not-just-for-dessert/</link>
		<comments>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/12/21/sweet-wines-not-just-for-dessert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dslocicero]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts by Others]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dessert wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Bonne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweet wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[table wines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opinionatedwineguide.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Bonne, wine writer for the San Francisco Chronicle recently wrote a piece about sweet wines.  Go read it.  I&#8217;ll wait.  Done?  Good. I tend to agree with him.  Sweet wines aren&#8217;t just for dessert.  They pair nicely with many foods, not just cake, particularly the rich &#8220;feasting&#8221; type foods that come out during the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/12/21/sweet-wines-not-just-for-dessert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Kinds of Wine Drinkers?</title>
		<link>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/05/19/three-kinds-of-wine-drinkers/</link>
		<comments>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/05/19/three-kinds-of-wine-drinkers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dslocicero]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opinionatedwineguide.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post recently postulated that there are three kinds of wine drinkers: Casual drinkers, Explorers and Aficionados.  The Casual drinker likes wine, but for them it is just a beverage.  Explorers are looking for obscure and undervalued wines.  Aficionados demand the best.  Personally, I think they left out a type: the Enthusiast&#8230;who is kind [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://opinionatedwineguide.com/2011/05/19/three-kinds-of-wine-drinkers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
